On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 19:26:34 -0500, Nvirjskly <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sunday, 19 August 2012 at 23:48:36 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Here are my results! iirc -release implies -noboundscheck..
Also I am on x64, and these files only compile to 32bit. So there could
be
performance missing there.
Wow, thanks. It looks like ldc2 does not play nice with std.bigint,
which is all the more reason for me to use my own version. If you want
to see it run and not assert out, remove benchmark_bbs(); from main() in
benchamrk.d
std.bigint seems to have a lot of problems as I had to repeatedly mess
around with things that SHOULD work. I think I should file a few bug
reports :/
I think GDC is dying because I have scope imports scattered everywhere
and it might not play nice with those... bah.
So it looks like ldc2 produces somewhat faster code, if not for the fact
that it did not play nice with std.bigint and that gdc does not follow
the reference compiler in its support of scope imports... :/
So basically my code is dmd only atm and can be easily converted to
support ldc2, and maybe gdc if scope imports are the only problem...
On the topic of Whirlpool, I'm almost done a naive non-optimised
version, and just need to make the S-box mixin.
Really? that was quick.
I didn't get very far with my attempt. =P
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
