On Monday, 20 August 2012 at 02:28:25 UTC, Nvirjskly wrote:
Really? that was quick.
I didn't get very far with my attempt. =P
Ok, committing a broken version. Broken in the sense that it
does not work correctly as of yet. *Something* is not working
properly. I work on finding out what exactly some more today
and tommorrow, but it is in a "usable" state, whereby usable I
mean that it returns hash values, just not ones matching any
test vectors... I have to figure out where my silly mistake is.
Quickly replying that I already found a few mistakes, and am
looking for more.
