On Friday, 9 November 2012 at 21:09:06 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Yes. public and protected are always virtual unless they're
final and don't
override anything (in which case, the compiler can choose to
make them non-
virtual). private and package are always non-virtual. IIRC
though, the docs
do need to be updated, since they imply that package is
virtual, even though
that's definitely not the case and isn't supposed to be the
case.
- Jonathan M Davis
It is very interested. I thought that 'package' is same as
'internal' from C#. I don't like that public, protected methods
is virtual and private, package is non-virtual implicitly. I
think that implicit behaviour is bad in most cases. And why can't
i change this behaviour explicitly for example by means abstract
attribute?
PS: Sorry for my bad English.
