On Monday, 10 December 2012 at 22:01:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/10/2012 01:52 PM, js.mdnq wrote:
> I want to avoid having to wrap the code with "
> " as it disables highlighting and possibly other
features(intellisense,
> etc...))
The q{} syntax is supposed to help with that issue. Emacs
manages syntax highlighting correctly for the q{} strings:
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
enum s = q{
writeln("hello world");
};
mixin (s); // <-- s is a string
}
Ali
I think the issue I have with all this is that when you put code
inside a string you lose a lot of compile time features AFAICT.
I can do
q{
struct _name_
{
.... normal struct code ...
}
} (but everything inside q is a string)
when I want to do
struct _name_
{
.... normal struct code ...
}
in code. The first is in a string and the second isn't. The
difference is that with q, I can parse the code and replace
_name, for example, while in the second case I can't.
It makes it difficult to build up code by mixing stringified code
and code. It's like, either you have to completely used
stringified code or not use any at all.
For example, what if I mispell writeln? Sure I get an error but
it's not at all the correct line number. But if I could use
"actual code" that then the error should be normal.
enum s = q{
writelin("hello world");
};
in a large program, it could get confusing very quickly because
essentially all errors will be pointing to oblivion.
This is why I want to all the user to supply actual code(and not
stringified code) so that errors will show up properly.
