On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Era Scarecrow <rtcv...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 January 2013 at 20:48:24 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:39 PM, monarch_dodra wrote: >> > > Anyways, the details are there if you want details. I don't know which >>> way it'll go. >>> >> >> OK. I'll wait for a stabilized syntax for alias this. >> >> But the new `alias newSym = oldSym;` is implemented, right? >> > > As far as I can tell, Yes. I'll still be using 'alias oldSym newSym;' for > a long time most likely, unless there's a big reason to switch. > When I stop D for a few weeks and come back to it, I'm sometimes confused as to which is the old symbol and which is the new one. For a declaration: type newSym = oldSym; is standard. alias nemSym = oldSym; will be easy to get used to
