On Wednesday, 9 January 2013 at 12:03:30 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 08.01.2013 22:43, schrieb Era Scarecrow:
That just means my unittest wouldn't work, so either it has to
be global or inside a struct/union/class (and global is not
very likely).
Thanks for clearing that up.
isn't that some sort of hijacking then?
Not sure how you mean, and I'm not sure how you would hi-Jack
it. It's a nested function, and shares no names with anything
else, private to the unittest; But the requirement to put it
inside a struct although semi-restrictive isn't enough of an
issue to rant about. Nested functions would probably be for
recursive or helper functions (lambdas?) and wouldn't need
overloading anyways.
