Am 09.01.2013 14:21, schrieb Philippe Sigaud:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Era Scarecrow <rtcv...@yahoo.com> wrote:
That's weird. Why does that work? Directly pasting the mixin content in
main() does not compile, right?
I can only assume if it does work, that the mixin template has it's own
scope that enables the overloading. If you can't do it with one, you
shouldn't be allowed to do it with the other.
That must be it. mixin can have names (mixin TemplateName AliasName;)
which the functions as a disambiguator.
I don't have access to a D compiler right now. Does this work?:
void main()
{
{
void test(ref int x) { x = test(); }
int test() { return 1; }
}
int x;
test(x);
assert(x == 1);
}
Overloading within nested functions is likely a rare use case.
I hit it while trying to change a module from struct+methods to purely
functions everywhere, to see if there were any efficiency difference.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/ ist your friend
Compilation output:
/home/c250/c278.d(4): Error: function c278.main.test (ref int x) is not
callable using argument types ()
/home/c250/c278.d(4): Error: expected 1 function arguments, not 0
/home/c250/c278.d(5): Error: declaration test is already defined
/home/c250/c278.d(8): Error: undefined identifier test
