On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 17:22:29 Namespace wrote: > On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 11:41:13 UTC, Namespace wrote: > > I wonder, if someone has already thought about "immutable ref". > > I can not imagine that many use it, so it wouldn't break (much) > > code. > > immutable ref works (for me) very well. Are there any pitfalls > that I can not see?
That there's no immutability involved? That would be an incredibly misleading choice. Not to mention, you can probably have a perfectly valid immutable ref right now if you want to pass a an immutable variable by ref, and using immutable ref for this would change its semantics. We probably just need an @something attribute with a good name. - Jonathan M Davis