On 04/10/2013 08:22 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote: > I'm pretty sure he realizes this, his original code shows how he is doing > this. > He expects 'output' to hold the final front value, but instead it holds the > empty "value." > > Joseph, I think you will have to profile to decide which is the fastest for > your > use case.
Agree. I do also see the risks in these assumptions with respect to front -- they can be safely worked around within my code but it's not a very friendly construction to put in front of other people.
