> __ctor is a 'this' call, it needs a this (BTW, I get different errors than > you):
Seems like not (see my corrected bug in previous post) > Not sure how you would do that in one line ditto >> Why not use 'this' instead of '__ctor', and make it documented (and >> reliable, ie work in the above case) ? >> I don't see how that could create ambiguity, and that would solve the >> problem raised in this thread. > > > You could do that. It may have some ambiguous syntax implications. I really can't think of any, and I think it would just make sense, given that it'd match the way the function is declared.
