On 05/15/2013 08:00 PM, bearophile wrote: > I think currently you have to use map!() to replace the tuple. Maybe am unsafe > map-cast suffices:
Feels a bit nasty, and I have the feeling it would probably slow things down ...
? :-(
I like the zipWith idea, though I can't help but wish zip() itself was flexible
enough to allow something like,
zip(arr1, "one", arr2, "two")
... though I guess that would fall over if you ever wanted to use zip to lock
together two immutable strings.
