On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 23:48:56 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 10/12/13 21:42, luminousone wrote:
On Saturday, 12 October 2013 at 11:50:05 UTC, Artur Skawina
wrote:
template isBaseOf(BASE, C) {
enum isBaseOf = {
static if (is(C S == super))
foreach (A; S)
static if (is(A==BASE))
return true;
return is(C==BASE);
}();
}
I like that! Avoids importing std.traits, And will correctly
handle interfaces as well.
It's also buggy. A more useful version would be:
template isBaseOf(BASE, C) {
enum isBaseOf = {
static if (is(C S == super))
foreach (A; S)
static if (isBaseOf!(BASE, A))
return true;
return is(C==BASE);
}();
}
Sorry, didn't test this properly; going to blame the dlang
is-expression docs.
It's not like D has multiple inheritance, so using "base
classes" (plural)
is very misleading...
artur
yea "is" can be a lil confusing, especially that "is( C S ==
super)" expression.
I take it that "is( C S == super)" is only the bases directly
listed for inheritance by the class and not the bases bases as
well? which is the reason for the change you made their?
That expression is weird lol.
