On Sunday, 19 January 2014 at 15:28:04 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Sunday, 19 January 2014 at 15:12:07 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
On Sunday, 19 January 2014 at 15:03:13 UTC, monarch_dodra
wrote:
So, my conclusion, "*" might be a workable solution. But
simply taking by ref would be cleaner, and make more sense as
a whole.
Or a special template constraint path for T*.
foo(T)(T t) if (is(T = Q*)) && manyOtherChecks!(Q)
foo(T)(T t) if (!is(T = Q*)) && manyOtherChecks!(T)
Maybe that will break less code.
But maybe we really should go for taking the output range by
reference. See
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10291
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9102
Created a new report for this:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11951
Thanks! I'll look into these.
