On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:24:14 -0500, Cooler <kul...@hotbox.ru> wrote:
On Thursday, 30 January 2014 at 14:40:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 30 January 2014 at 13:42:53 UTC, Cooler wrote:
If I use fun2() I expect that fun2() will change the content of my
array, and all changes I will see. If I don't want any change to my
array, I will use fun1(). What should I want to use fun3()?
For changes to content of array but not array itself.
I agree. I just want that the case can be expressed in language syntax
more obvious - something like "fun(int[] const x){}" to emphasize that I
understand that fun() can change content of array, and cannot change the
{pointer,size} pair.
That's what fun(int[] x) does :)
-Steve
