Re: Array as an argument, ambiguous behaviour.

[Tobias Pankrath]

On Thursday, 30 January 2014 at 15:49:35 UTC, Cooler wrote:

I agree. I just want that the case can be expressed in language syntax more obvious - something like "fun(int[] const x){}" to emphasize that I understand that fun() can change content of array, and cannot change the {pointer,size} pair.

That's what fun(int[] x) does :)

-Steve

Again...
void fun(int[] x){ x ~= 5; }
auto a = new int[10];
fun(a); // Can you predict the content of 'a'?

It's [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0].