On Tuesday, 25 March 2014 at 01:15:10 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 23:55:14 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
Any alternatives??
I moved cmaked2 to github [1], updated and simplified the
usage a
little (system cmake patch not necessary anymore). You can give
it a try. Dub registry support is also on the way.
Regards
Dragos
[1] - https://github.com/dcarp/cmake-d
Heh, seems I waited a bit too long, eh? I've been gearing up to
do an initial release of some modifications to CMake that give
better D support. (To clarify: this isn't being merged upstream
yet, but hopefully that'll happen eventually)
While the approach taken by CMakeD2 and cmake-d gets a good
amount of the way there, it lacks key CMake features. Namely:
Visual Studio support, which unfortunately requires patching
the C++ source.
The module-only approach also cannot support LDC (save via
ldmd, which is not ideal), as CMake will think it is a linker.
There were other problems I encountered that required changes
to the C++ code as well, though I don't recall what they were
off the top of my head.
Realized late last night that I misspoke. LDC and LDMD will
both be detected as a linker, and the change to fix that
doesn't touch the C++ source, but it does need to be done in
CMake's internal modules.
- Trent
I'm curious to see how you intend to do dub support, though.
- Trent
