Re: const ref parameters and r-value references

[via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On Sunday, 4 May 2014 at 11:15:59 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:

On 05/04/2014 12:58 PM, "Marc Schütz" <schue...@gmx.net>" wrote:

This means that you will still get a (bit-wise) copy if you pass in an

r-value. But semantically, this is a move, not a copy, so it is

potentially cheaper than a copy (if your type has an expensive postblit).

It can be constructed in-place.

Doesn't that depend on the ABI?