Re: Any chance to avoid monitor field in my class?

[Yuriy via Digitalmars-d-learn]

Imho, offtop, also i'm a C++/Obj-C guy and that might partially 
explain my preferences, but here are some more reasons:
1. I like the concept of CT-reflection and CTFE a lot. This makes 
metaprogramming extremely powerful without any RT overheads. It 
brings a lot more control to what goes to RT. I guess D still 
needs to shrink it's runtime a bit more, and __monitors is just 
another example of that.
2. It's extremely easy for C++/C#/Java/Objc-C developers to 
switch to D without loosing any bit of their productivity, but 
gaining lots of possibilities, that can be used in future. And 
C++/C#/Java/Obj-C is the majority of the world now. Even PHP 
developers should think of D one day =).
3. That's the most arguable, but D's syntax and semantics looks 
much cleaner and uniform to me than Rust's.