On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 06:24:27 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 13/05/14 02:10, FrankLike wrote:
1.DFL's Memory Usage is the least than other. winsamp.exe is
2.1M,DFL's
example's exe is 2.7M.
2.The size of DFL's example's exe files is the least than
other, and
only a single file.
3.DFL's source code is the most easy to understand.
Although DFL not use on Linux or Mac os X,it's easy to do for
high level
Software Engineer.
Now D need a simple ,quickly,easy to study UI Controls for D
to develop.
I would think it would get more complicated if it got support
for other platforms. Also, without having looked at its
features, I'm guessing it's not as comprehensive as DWT, Gtk or
Qt.
Thank you.
DWT AND DFL ,their Memory Usage is the least .
but DWT is more complicated than DFL.
Look at the base control :Button
at DFL :only 270 lines ,
but at DWT: need >1400 lines.
Thank you again.
