well you are wrong. but it turns stomach to waste a lot of time
searching in a huge collection of projects that were started and
not finished. those are still advertised in a wiki.
nobody wants a collection of incomplete shambles - its
unfortunatly a huge turn off.
one does pay a price for complex thing - sure - no problem. but
do they work not just for x32, are they complete ...
D/phobos is regrettably still a tinkertoy collection for people
that have plenty of time.
i mean no offence, i am just disapointed of the overall usability
of it all.
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 21:23:04 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 at 20:42:11 UTC, jack death wrote:
"It would be cool if somebody will handle developing of DFL.
It's
better to have one such toolkit, than tons of complex and not
finished toolkits."
Tkd is finished.
Gtk-D is finished.
You aren't going to get very far unless you actually learn to
use
your tools, complex or not. Tkd is about as simple as it gets
for
GUI programming. Tkd-D is more complex but that's the price you
pay for needing to create something more complex.
isn't that the truth. as much as i like D, i find it unusable
for me, since i do not have a ui-/db-toolkit. i want to use
the language, not invent everything every step or fight for it.
You've obviously never looked.
https://github.com/gtkd-developers/GtkD
https://github.com/nomad-software/tkd
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/mysql-native
http://dlang.org/phobos/etc_c_sqlite3.html
https://github.com/adilbaig/Tiny-Redis
http://www.wikiservice.at/d/wiki.cgi?DatabaseBindings
