On 12/19/14 10:42 AM, zeljkog wrote:
On 19.12.14 16:25, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This is surprising to me. I would expect especially ints to be faster.
In reality, there is no difference between arr ~= args and arr.length +=
args.length, and then copying, it's just how you do the copying. Perhaps
it's the call to memcpy in the runtime that is slower than looping.
I think it's compile time looping, it's unrolled.
Ah, good point. Your solution is definitely preferable then, and I hope
at some point the compiler can make that the result of appending an
array literal.
-Steve
