On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 21:22:04 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 19:09:42 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 14:27:49 UTC, ixid wrote:Is there an elegant way of avoiding implicit conversion to int when you're using shorter types?Only with library solution. Implicit conversions are built into language.Doesn't that seem rather limiting and unnecessary?
Well, indeed it often produces confusion (this is inherited from C for compatibility purpose).
