this compiles without error:
struct Foo { int i; void bar() { void foo() const { i = 1; } foo; } }In this case "const" seems to be a noop. Do you think it's a bug ? Shouldn't "const" be applied, despite of foo() inaccessibility ?
this compiles without error:
struct Foo { int i; void bar() { void foo() const { i = 1; } foo; } }In this case "const" seems to be a noop. Do you think it's a bug ? Shouldn't "const" be applied, despite of foo() inaccessibility ?