On Thursday, 7 July 2016 at 15:02:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, July 07, 2016 10:33:39 Basile B. via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
this compiles without error:
struct Foo
{
int i;
void bar()
{
void foo() const
{
i = 1;
}
foo;
}
}
In this case "const" seems to be a noop. Do you think it's a
bug ? Shouldn't "const" be applied, despite of foo()
inaccessibility ?
It makes no sense for const to be used on foo. foo is not a
member function, so there's nothing for the const to apply to.
`foo()` is effectively a delegate, therefore `const` applies to
the context.
