On 09/03/2017 03:03 AM, ag0aep6g wrote: > On 09/03/2017 01:39 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote: >> If we can convert byte-by-byte, we should be able to >> convert back byte-by-byte, right? > > You weren't converting byte-by-byte.
In my mind I was! :o) > Or maybe just convert everything to UTF-8 first. That also sidesteps any > endianess issues. Good point. > Still fails with UTF-16 and UTF-32 strings:I think I can make it work with a few more iterations but I'll leave it as an exercise for the author.
Ali
