On Wednesday, 20 September 2017 at 02:36:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 02:16:16 EntangledQuanta via
Digitalmars-d- learn wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 21:17:53 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 17:40:20 UTC,
> EntangledQuanta
>
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> There are two issues there; operator precedence and booleans
> (_win[0] == '@') being a valid operands to +.
> If someone is too stupid to learn how precedence works, they
> should consider a different career instead of blaming others.
> OTOH, booleans converting to numbers is a very questionable
> feature. I certainly have never seen any good use for it.
> This
> is just an unfortunate legacy of C, which didn't even have
> booleans for a long time.
Your an idiot, I know about how operator precedence works far
more than you do. Wanna bet? how much? Your house? your wife?
Your life? It's about doing things correctly, you seem to fail
to understand, not your fault, can't expect a turd to
understand logic.
Please try to be civil. It's fine if you're unhappy about some
aspect of how D works and want to discuss it, but we do not
condone personal attacks here.
- Jonathan M Davis
But, of course, It's ok for him to come me an idiot. Let me
quote, not that it matters, since you are biased and a hypocrite:
">> > If someone is too stupid to learn how precedence works, they
> should consider a different career instead of blaming
> others."
But when I call him an idiot, I'm put in the corner.
I see how it works around here. What a cult!
