I would say it is a still regression, but I agree with you, that it should not work on the first place.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 3:28 PM, bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn < digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 at 13:38:56 UTC, drug wrote: > >> done https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18539 >> > > I would argue that isn't a regression and that you __should__ use the .get > and that it's not a workaround, because nullable's shouldn't be treated > like that type they encapsulate. > > std.math members such as approxEqual shouldn't have to take nullable into > account. >
