Why does D complain when using == to compare with null? Is there really any technical reason? if one just defines == null to is null then there should be no problem. It seems like a pedantic move by who ever implemented it and I'm hoping there is actually a good technical reason for it.
  • is == IntegratedDimensions via Digitalmars-d-learn
    • Re: is == Uknown via Digitalmars-d-learn
      • Re: is == IntegratedDimensions via Digitalmars-d-learn
    • Re: is == Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d-learn
      • Re: is == Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
      • Re: is == Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d-learn
        • Re: is == Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
        • Re: is == Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d-learn
          • Re: is == Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
      • Re: is == Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
        • Re: is == Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn

Reply via email to