On Friday, 9 November 2018 at 06:42:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 7:25:45 PM MST Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars- d-learn wrote:
It's not a forum. It's a newsgroup that happens to have a web interface. Newsgroups are text-only. So bbcode is out, html is out, but interpreting markdown might be reasonable. But nobody's done that work.

Honestly, having markdown in messages being typical would be _really_ annoying for those of us not using the web interface, because we'd see all of those backticks and the like as backticks, not as syntax highlighting. It would be like seeing html, albeit far less intrusive. I for one would much rather that things just stay as pure text and that we not be adding any features to the web interface that encourages adding _any_ kind of markup to messages. The web interface makes it easier for folks who don't want to use a newsgroup or mailing list to interact with the newsgroup, but it's still a newsgroup, and _many_ of us use it as such.

- Jonathan M Davis

I just want to say everyone who doesn't use the web-interface has to look at markdown anyway because people still write code in backticks etc. despite no support; even I do that.

Using markdown without support to me is not so much about whether it should be highlighted or not, but just that you can separate content from code in your message.

Similar to how signatures are usually separated by 3 or more slashes and then a new line:

Ex:

---

Some signature

Reply via email to