On Tuesday, 1 January 2019 at 20:43:13 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Realistically, if you use Java or C++ highlighting, it will
look plenty good enough for D too.
Yeah, I was thinking that. I'd imagine it would be missing a few
keywords, though.
So take a look down my highlight test page for my adrdox
generator:
http://dpldocs.info/experimental-docs/adrdox.highlight.html
That's pretty cool. Thanks. However, I'm not seeing anyway to
grab this and use it. I clicked on links, but didn't really find
my way to a better understanding.
(which btw i also happen to use for my new blog
http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2018_12_31.html )
I'll have to check that out.
I wrote like 30 lines of code and very simple definitions to
support all the languages in that test. And it is plenty good
enough.
Cool. And I can download this? I don't know if I'm being dim, but
I really don't see how to.
Of course, it DOES support D, extremely fully - it has a
full-blown D lexer in there. But tbh if I use the C family
highlighter for D you usually can't tell the difference.
No doubt! :)
