On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 17:25 +0000, berni via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > […] > > Yes, that was intentional. What I wanted to say is, that I think, > that it would have been better, if C was never invented at all... > In that case, there would have been space for an other language > for writing operating systems, without that much bugs in its > design. (But one never knows afterwards...)
If C had not been invented by Ritchie, Thompson, et al., something very like it would have been invented by someone else. BCPL and B were not really gaining the traction they perhaps should have had, and Algol, Algol68, FORTRAN, PL/1, COBOL, etc. were not really designed for writing operating systems. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_programming_languages The problem was not the invention of C, the problem was all those programmers who stopped thinking about using the right tool for a given task in a given context, and started using C for all programming situations. But it happened, it is read-only history. Rust, D, and Go are the current ways out of the tragedy that was using C for applications programming. C++ is finally catching up. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
