"Nick Sabalausky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Vermi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Hi, >> I'm wondering : why the D compiler can't produce x86_64 code ? All seems >> to be ready in the langage for 64 bits. I need to produce a .dll file in >> both 32 and 64 bits, but I can't. Will we see soon a 64 bits version of >> the D Compiler or should I re-write my apps in C++ ? >> >> @+ >> Vermi > > I suppose I'm getting a bit behind the tech curve here, but is there a > reason to compile to x86_64 other than just to speed things up on the > already-rediculously-fact 64-bit processors? (or to access more than 4GB > of ram, but then, how often does anyone need to write an app that needs to > do that?)
"...already-ridiculously-fast..." Sorry, momentarily forgot my newsgroup client doesn't have spellcheck (not that it would help with "fact" vs "fast")
