On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:54 AM, grauzone <n...@example.net> wrote: >> Hmmmmm. Name for a common namespace...... How about.... "common". > > Every time you introduce a new standard namespace, a bunch of innocent > existing D programs might become invalid. >
I do in fact have a top level package called "common" where I put a bunch of code that is common to my various projects. But I would happily rename it in a heartbeat if it meant greater unification between Phobos and Tango. 'Tis a small price to pay. --bb