BCS wrote:
Reply to bearophile,

Chris Nicholson-Sauls:

My only concern is druntime turning into a "third stdlib."  Have to
draw a line somewhere.

The bigger core becomes, the less stuff (and code) is done in two ways
in Tango and Phobos, so I think it's good to have a larger and larger
"core". This third stdlib is the common shared one, after all :-)

Bye,
bearophile

The only things that should go in are the things that both sides can agree on how to do.



That makes it looks like a structure built on political, not technical, foundations. Without having thought much about it, I can say it doesn't quite sound right.

Andrei

Reply via email to