Don wrote: ... > Are people OK with some of their code breaking for the sake of unity? > For the math stuff, that would mean name changes on minor functions such as: > isnormal() -> isNormal() > > I need a mandate.
Yes I think that's more than worth it. For D2 direction is to move towards compatibility and code breaking will happen anyway. Beyond mere runtime compatibility any unification that is uncontroversial is a no brainer imho.
