John Reimer wrote:
Hello bearophile,
(And my name is bearophile, thank you).
Bye,
bearophile
At first, I thought this alias was innocent enough, but after visiting
your much promoted site (promoted in the D community), I'm not so sure
what to think. I almost blanched at some of the content and greatly
regretted having visited it.
Of course, it is equally people's right here to support you in your
freedom to display such things (while providing the links here). If
they do, however, it speaks volumes about peoples general apathy to the
downward spiral of society where increasingly indecent content is seen
as normal and harmless. This is a great shame, and I'd be sorry to see
that people don't care anymore.
John, I think you make a valid point that the D community should check
that any site which is officially linked to, provides reasonable
indication when you are leaving the technical section, particularly when
there's potential for offense. (For example, linking to a terrorist
website might be damaging for D).
But in other respects, if you're arguing from a Christian perspective, I
don't see how bearophile's apparent acknowledgement of the truth of
Romans 1 is anything but beneficial. He's no different from any of us.
Rom 3:23.
-Don.
