Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
auto b = uniform!("[]")(rng, byte.min, byte.max);
Is this acceptable?
If that's what it took I'd probably try this instead:
ubyte b = uniform(rng, 0,256);
And then add an explicit cast to ubyte if the compiler didn't like that.
So no, I don't really think that's good enough. Others may disagree
about how important a use case this is, though.
This will indeed work:
ubyte b = cast(ubyte) uniform(rng, 0,256);
I just showed the solution involving no cast. So are you ok with that?
No, but if you are then I'll just make my own 1-liner library
functions, so it's not a big deal.
What signatures would the functions have?
Andrei
