On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 07:09:34 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I don't think char[] is half bad. const(char)[] is a mouthful, but most > of the time those are function parameters, where the handy in char[] > applies. I was think more as unambiguous words we can use in discussions and not so much as aliases in our code. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell
