Ary Borenszweig Wrote: > Mike James escribió: > > What is the state of play with D1.0 vs. D2.0? > > > > Is D1.0 a dead-end and D2.0 should be used for future projects? > > > > Is D2.0 stable enough for use at the present? > > > > Is Tango for D2.0 at a level of D1.0 and can be used now? > > > > Is DWT ready for D2.0 now? > > > > > > Regards, mike. > > I don't know why a lot of people see D1.0 as a dead-end. It's a stable > language. It won't get new features. It won't change. It'll probably > receive bug fixes. It works. It gets the job done. You can use it and be > sure than in a time all of what you did will still be compatible with > "newer" versions of D1.
No. It's not stable. Try to build last Tango and DWT releases with D1.041 and you will get the problems. That is the causes a lot of people ask such questions. And I too. Not because D1.0 dead-end. But because I can't understand what is "stable" toolset and how long it would be "stable". D+Tango+DWT is a good example. Regards, valeri.
