ValeriM wrote: > Ary Borenszweig Wrote: > >> Mike James escribi�: >>> What is the state of play with D1.0 vs. D2.0? >>> >>> Is D1.0 a dead-end and D2.0 should be used for future projects? >>> >>> Is D2.0 stable enough for use at the present? >>> >>> Is Tango for D2.0 at a level of D1.0 and can be used now? >>> >>> Is DWT ready for D2.0 now? >>> >>> >>> Regards, mike. >> I don't know why a lot of people see D1.0 as a dead-end. It's a stable >> language. It won't get new features. It won't change. It'll probably >> receive bug fixes. It works. It gets the job done. You can use it and be >> sure than in a time all of what you did will still be compatible with >> "newer" versions of D1. > > No. It's not stable. > Try to build last Tango and DWT releases with D1.041 and you will get the > problems.
"It's a stable language." Note the use of the word "language." What you're referring to are bugs in the compiler. It happens. -- Daniel
