On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: > Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: >> >> I don't necessarily want a 100% stable language. In fact I don't. But >> obviously asking for both is just silly. >> The only thing I'm not happy about is if code that used to work, still >> compiles, but no longer works. This is where the real problem is and >> I've seen it several times. MinWin, APaGeD and probably others. > > What do you suggest? > > It's why there's a "last stable version" of D1 on the website. With any > software package, if you always download the latest version but another > package was only tested with a different version, it's likely to have > problems.
I'm not sure about what to do with the damage done already. I think it came across worse than I meant it to. In the future I think this can largely be solved by my public source repository proposal. >
