bearophile schrieb:
Daniel Keep:
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreaded-I-O.html&Itemid=29
Is this an improvement of the DMD backend? Now I'm curious: isn't DMD a legacy
backend? If this is true, isn't improving it a waste of time, and time is
better spent improving something like LLVM? (I am not trying to offend anyone
here, I am just curious).
Bye,
bearophile
i don't think that llvm is a good playground for walters ideas in
backend and frontend development because he knows is backend very well
(for many years now) - its bugs, sleeping features, way to compile and
extend it
llvm is still missing windows execptions and maybe many others things
and it is more that 50% of the whole project (except the language
itselfe) even the gcc-guys still mantain there own backend
