bearophile wrote:
Daniel Keep:
http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Multithreaded-I-O.html&Itemid=29
Is this an improvement of the DMD backend? Now I'm curious: isn't DMD a legacy
backend? If this is true, isn't improving it a waste of time, and time is
better spent improving something like LLVM? (I am not trying to offend anyone
here, I am just curious).
Bye,
bearophile
DMD still produces better integer code (on x86) than GDC or LLVMDC. And
it's fast at generating code. So "legacy" as it may be, it still has
some strengths.
