Paul D. Anderson wrote:
Sounds like someone needs a strong dose of D!!
http://java.dzone.com/articles/why-java-doesnt-need-operator
The comments bounce between "operator overloading is always bad because you can do idiotic
things with it" and "operator overloading is essential because sometimes you really need
it".
How about a language where operator overloading is available for the cases
where you do really need it, but isn't available in general?
Hmmm...
Paul
How about a language where expression overloading is available, etc?
