Don wrote:
I don't see _anything_ dynamic in this proposal, actually.
Yes. The amount of confusion in this thread is staggering. I think the right question to ask is, "what does opDotExp bring, that wasn't there before?"
Is it reflection of any kind? No.Is it the ability to encode operation names as strings, be they static or dynamic? No.
Is it the ability to syntactically replace a statically-provided method name with an equally statically-known string? That's pretty much it.
Andrei
