On 24.04.2009 08:24, dennis luehring wrote:
dennis luehring schrieb:
Andrei Alexandrescu schrieb:
dennis luehring wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu schrieb:
does that also mean that strings are getting template based?
what amount of debug-code will produce this? like with the stl (or
boost) - zillion megabytes for 9 lines of code? and i can throw away my
debugger (if D will get a good one)
im always shocked when looking at the stl/boost based assembler code in
debug releases - does D generate less code?
but i still like the idea of getting more generic at the base :-)
the result will less special cases for the compiler and no
that-can-only-the-compiler-do scenarios
but the downside - are the error messages then still that informative
and what is the code bloat in the end - but maybe walter found a way to
code-specialize the Array!/Assoc! (i hope to see better initalizers then
- maybe static ones :-]) stuff for the standard datatypes - and then
everything is fine ...
still waiting for D 3 - the concurrency wonderland ...
