On 2012-11-07 15:08, deadalnix wrote:

This is nice, but lack the possible to explore the internal of the
function and to surgery in it :D

Still a step forward.

I'm not entirely sure I understand. Do you mean that you won't see the output of the macro? In that case the compiler should have a flag for outputting the result of a macro.

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to