Le 07/11/2012 18:58, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2012-11-07 15:08, deadalnix wrote:This is nice, but lack the possible to explore the internal of the function and to surgery in it :D Still a step forward.I'm not entirely sure I understand. Do you mean that you won't see the output of the macro? In that case the compiler should have a flag for outputting the result of a macro.
I'm talking about the ability for the macro to modify the macroed code, not only to wrap it.