On 11/8/2012 9:24 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
So, I really don't see this as a problem.
Neither do I.BTW, there's no compiler magic in the world that will statically guarantee you have a non-buggy implementation of a range.
On 11/8/2012 9:24 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
So, I really don't see this as a problem.
Neither do I.BTW, there's no compiler magic in the world that will statically guarantee you have a non-buggy implementation of a range.