On Thursday, November 08, 2012 21:49:52 Walter Bright wrote: > BTW, there's no compiler magic in the world that will statically guarantee > you have a non-buggy implementation of a range.
That's what unit tests are for. :) - Jonathan M Davis
On Thursday, November 08, 2012 21:49:52 Walter Bright wrote: > BTW, there's no compiler magic in the world that will statically guarantee > you have a non-buggy implementation of a range.
That's what unit tests are for. :) - Jonathan M Davis